Worked examples
The question
Question: 200 people were chosen at random from a city.
Half of them were chosen at random to drink green tea each day.
The tea group slept longer.
What can the study say?
1 Two questions
To judge a study, we ask two questions.
How were the people picked?
And how were the groups made?
2 How they were picked
The story says the people were chosen at random from the city.
So: yes.
At random means all the people in the city had the same chance to be picked.
So the group is a fair small copy of the whole city.
random: all people in the city had the same chance
So what we find can be used for the whole city: true for all people in the city.
3 How the groups were made
The people were chosen at random to drink green tea each day.
So: yes.
Chance made the groups, not the people.
So the two groups are alike, except for the tea.
random groups: alike, except for the tea
So the difference comes from the tea: the tea causes it.
Careful!
Only for the city they were picked from.
Not for all people everywhere.
Careful: not true for all people everywhere ✗
4 What the study can say
So the study can say: for all people in the city, the tea causes this.
= causes it, for the whole city
5 Check
Let's check with the story.
The first sentence says: chosen at random from the city.
That matches.
"chosen at random from" → all the city
The second sentence says: chosen at random to drink green tea each day.
That matches too.
So the answer is right!
"chosen at random to" → causes
Let's look back.
First: two questions.
Then: how they were picked.
Then: how the groups were made.
Then: what the study can say.
Last: check.
Answer = causes it, for the whole city
▶ Watch it solved
The question
Question: 50 dogs were picked at random from a shelter.
Half of them were picked at random to get a new food.
The new food group gained more weight.
What can the study say?
1 Two questions
To judge a study, we ask two questions.
How were the dogs picked?
And how were the groups made?
2 How they were picked
The story says the dogs were chosen at random from the shelter.
So: yes.
At random means all the dogs in the shelter had the same chance to be picked.
So the group is a fair small copy of the whole shelter.
random: all dogs in the shelter had the same chance
So what we find can be used for the whole shelter: true for all dogs in the shelter.
3 How the groups were made
The dogs were chosen at random to get a new food.
So: yes.
Chance made the groups, not the dogs.
So the two groups are alike, except for the new food.
random groups: alike, except for the new food
So the difference comes from the new food: the new food causes it.
Careful!
Only for the shelter they were picked from.
Not for all dogs everywhere.
Careful: not true for all dogs everywhere ✗
4 What the study can say
So the study can say: for all dogs in the shelter, the new food causes this.
= causes it, for the whole shelter
5 Check
Let's check with the story.
The first sentence says: chosen at random from the shelter.
That matches.
"chosen at random from" → all the shelter
The second sentence says: chosen at random to get a new food.
That matches too.
So the answer is right!
"chosen at random to" → causes
Let's look back.
First: two questions.
Then: how they were picked.
Then: how the groups were made.
Then: what the study can say.
Last: check.
Answer = causes it, for the whole shelter
▶ Watch it solved
The question
Question: 320 adults were picked at random from a city.
Half of them chose to drink coffee every morning.
The coffee group worked faster.
What can the study say?
1 Two questions
To judge a study, we ask two questions.
How were the adults picked?
And how were the groups made?
2 How they were picked
The story says the adults were chosen at random from the city.
So: yes.
At random means all the adults in the city had the same chance to be picked.
So the group is a fair small copy of the whole city.
random: all adults in the city had the same chance
So what we find can be used for the whole city: true for all adults in the city.
3 How the groups were made
The adults chose for themselves.
So: no, not at random.
People who choose to drink coffee every morning may be different in other ways too.
they chose: the groups may differ in other ways
Careful!
Doing better does not prove the coffee caused it.
Something else may make the difference.
Careful: not the coffee group did better → causes ✗
So the coffee and the better result go together.
But maybe the coffee did not cause it.
4 What the study can say
So the study can say: in the city, the coffee and the result go together, but maybe the coffee is not the cause.
= linked in the city, maybe not caused
5 Check
Let's check with the story.
The first sentence says: chosen at random from the city.
That matches.
"chosen at random from" → all the city
The second sentence says: they chose.
That matches too.
So the answer is right!
"chose" → maybe not caused
Let's look back.
First: two questions.
Then: how they were picked.
Then: how the groups were made.
Then: what the study can say.
Last: check.
Answer = linked in the city, maybe not caused
▶ Watch it solved